Reading Response 5/10- Apps, Blockchain, and Digital Currency

I like the point that the reading The Mobile Browser is Dead, Long Live the App raises about applications relationship with mobile browsers, such as Google and Apple. It is apparent that apps are the future of online technology, but in order to exist and function, they need a platform to be housed in; “where a mobile web promotes access to everyone for everyone, the app model hands the gatekeepers the power of access and discovery, leaving the service providers beholden to their policies, their platform tools, and their rules, which change with little notice” (Spence). Since users are more frequently using applications, rather than mobile browsers, it makes sense that developers would want an OS system dedicated solely to the marketing and development of apps. Applications have played a crucial part in creating a more competitive digital delivery marketplace. For example, an application such as WhatsApp mimics the same function as text messaging, but is much more cost effective for consumers. Therefore, users are rapidly switching over and forgoing text messaging all together. Since WhatsApp is currently being housed on a third party browser it poses a threat. Various websites with online messaging systems are also feeling the heat from these opposing apps, and big-name companies such as Facebook are looking to buy out and take ownership of WhatsApp to stay ahead of the game.

As someone who still has trouble grasping what Bitcoin is and what it does, the reading The Fierce Battle for the Soul of Bitcoin was able to shed some light. However, the battle to integrate Bitcoin into the economy in a user-friendly way seems very difficult. It seems that digital currency is hard to regulate, and users have to possess extensive knowledge of coding and software in order to properly use it; “There are simply not many reasons why the average person would want to use bitcoin” (McMillan).  I wholly agree with this statement. Bitcoin seems more complicated than it’s worth, and only appeals to a niche community. If it doesn’t benefit or appeal to a majority of people, than why try to integrate it as a standard form of currency? Not to mention, the security surrounding Bitcoin and its “wallet” system seems extremely risky; especially to users who are not internet savvy.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.